Saturday, March 26, 2016

Prezi Evaluatng Teaching and Learning at a Distance


Objectives Evaluating Teachinf and Learning at a Distance


4.1 Differentiate between research and evaluation - When differentiating between research and evaluation one must know what they mean. Research produces generalizable knowledge, scientific inquiry based on intellectual curiosity, advances broad knowledge and theory and controlled setting while evaluation judges merit or worth, policy & program interests of stakeholders’ paramount, provides information for decision-making on specific program, conducted within setting of changing actors, priorities, resources, & timeline.

4.2 Define evaluation - Evaluation, as contrasted to research is the systematic investigation of the worth or merit of an object. Evaluation of programs is used to identify strengths and weaknesses well as the benefits and drawbacks of teaching and learning online. There are five steps when discussing evaluation and distance education which are reactions (did they like it), learning (did they learn it), transfer (will they use it) results (will it matter) and return on investment.

4.3 Explain the six categories of evaluation information: in measures of activity, efficiency, outcomes, program aims, policy, and organizations - The six categories of evaluation information are measures in activity (questions such as how many courses were produced and how many students were served), efficiency (questions include how many students successfully completed the course and what was the average students workload how much did the course cost), outcomes (measures of adequate learning and documenting the borrowing and use of courses and course materials), program aims (surveys of learners), policy and organizations (evaluation).

4.4 Describe the AEIOU approach to evaluation and its five levels—
accountability, effectiveness, impact, organizational - Accountability is defined as did the project planners do what they said they were going to do, effectiveness is how well done was the project, impact  is did the project, course, or program make a difference, organizational context which means what structures, policies or events in the organization or environment helped or hindered the project in accomplishing its goals and unanticipated consequences which is what changes or consequences of importance happened as a result of the project that was not expected.

URLs Evaluating Teaching and Learning at a Distance



 


 


 

Definitions Evaluating Teaching and Learning at a Distance


Definitions Evaluating Teaching and Learning at a Distance

1.     Evaluation, as contrasted to research, is the systematic investigation of the worth or merit of an object. Program evaluation is the systematic investigation of the worth of an ongoing or continuing distance education activity.

2.    Measures of activity. These measures are counts of the numbers of events, people, and objects. Administrative records often provide data for activity questions.

3.    Measures of efficiency. Measures of efficiency are closely related to measures of activity, and often administrative records can be the source of efficiency information.

4.    Measures of outcomes. Measures of adequate learning are usually considered the most important measures of outcomes of distance education activities. Often, interviews with learners are used to supplement course grades in order to find students’ perceptions about a distance education activity.

5.    Measures of program aims. Some distance teaching programs specify their aims in terms of what and whom they intend to teach, and evaluation information is collected to establish the extent to which these aims were met.

6.    Measures of organizations. Sometimes it is important to evaluate a distance education institution in terms of its internal organization and procedures. Evaluators sometimes are asked to monitor the process of course development or program delivery to help an organization be more efficient.

7.    Accountability. Evaluators checked records, interviewed staff, and visited classrooms to determine the status of the development of the ICN, both as a physical system and as a tool used by teachers to deliver courses to distant learners. The accountability focus shifted during the project as its activities shifted from construction to implementation and finally to maintenance.

8.    Effectiveness. Evaluators conducted interviews and focus groups to determine what impact the availability of the ICN had on classroom education. Surveys were sent and reports were generated that helped education leaders to better understand what role distance education was playing.

9.    Impact. As the network became widely available and the number of courses and activities increased, it became possible to determine the impact of the ICN and distance education events on education in the state. Students were tested and grades reported.

10.                       The AEIOU approach is similar to Woodley and Kirkwood’s in that is an electric one that uses quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and it has two primary purposes as an evaluation strategy.

 

 

Prezi Managing and Leading a Distance Education Organization


Wednesday, March 23, 2016

URLs Managing and Leading at a Distance


http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/html/cem/cem97/cem9734. Html

http://wiche.edu/telecom/Accrediting%20-%20Commitment.pdf

http://search.ntia.doc.gov/pdf/fttn00.pdf

Objectives Managing and Leading at a Distance


4.1 Describe the functions of a distance education administrator in each of the four subsystems of a distance education system.

The administrative functions are to provide strategic leadership and direction, conduct program analysis, maintains the organizational website ensures availability and responsiveness for all student support requirements and ensures fiscal responsibility for online courses and programs.

4.2 Describe the major national, regional, and local issues that affect distance education programs.

The things that affect the different levels are financial aid, how distance education is being taught and telecommunications.

4.3 List and explain the significant areas of cost in the development, delivery, and evaluation of distance education programs.

Distance education is expensive. Personnel costs typically are the majority of the total budgets for distance education programs. Even if these costs are prorated portions of the organizational budget, they can be extraordinary, depending on the size of the program. When budgets get cut development and delivery was cut first.

4.4 Describe a successful program for training faculty to teach effectively in a distance education environment.

A successful and effective curriculum should include the unique attributes and needs of distance learners, assessments of students at a distance, course evaluation, course management factors such as office hours, course instructional design for distance delivery and effective use of embedded technologies.

4.5 Explain how the federal and state governments and accreditation agencies evaluate distance education programs.

Their primary emphasis is on program quality, to protect the public from diploma mills. The federal government evaluates it by student financial aid, copyright, school and public access, and data gathering. The state governments evaluate it having students participate in lab or clinical at an in state site and the instruction participates in in-state college affairs. The regional accreditation agencies in particular are rapidly becoming distance education administrations best friends in promoting distance education and upholding quality standards.

4.6 Explain how access and accessibility issues should influence distance education programs.

The web can be an important tool for disabled students. Students at a distance, however, can be a greater disadvantage if they are without easy access to campus based disability resources and advocacy for accessible web resources.

4.7 Explain how intellectual property issues should be addressed at the local level.

In the absence the ownership of online courses or course materials developed by a teacher should be specified in the employment contract or collective bargaining agreement. The best thing to do before questions become issues is to develop an organizational intellectual policy to which all parties agree.